Propaganda In, Propaganda Out

There must be about 4 Americans left who still believe that our country is the pinnacle of truth and justice, but for the rest of us, here is an interesting vision of the US propaganda machine, culled from diverse sources.

In this morning’s NY Times, there is an article about TV Marti, an uplifting US-based reality TV sunbeam, lasered by special airplane down to Cuba’s huddled masses.

The federal International Broadcasting Bureau, which also operates the Voice of America, says the purpose of Radio and TV Martí is to broadcast “accurate and objective news and information” to Cuba, where news is tightly controlled by the government.

although not all agree with this assessment:

‘The really shrill, outrageous kind of stuff they broadcast has no credibility in Cuba,’ said John Nichols, a communications professor at Pennsylvania State University who studies Radio and TV Martí.

Who to believe?
This interesting display of worldwide Newsweek covers that is circulating around the ROWWW (Rest-of-World-Wide-Web) might help inquiring minds see more clearly:

Newsweek around the world

Regrettably, I wasn’t able to find an example of Newsweek’s cover for Cuban distribution to complete this entry.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

5 Days Without

Our ADSL went down for 5 days. Pretty awful occurrence. (Worse still is the realization of how important our high-speed internet connexion has become for mental well-being. But that’s another tale.)

Anyway, we’re back now, thanks to the intervention of an old friend who works at France Telecom. If not for his efficiency (3 hours from first panic call on fifth day without to final resolution) we would have been three weeks without! We would have spent those 3 weeks, making endless calls to FT and to Free (our ADSL provider), who would each, in turn, say it was the fault of the other.

By a strange coincidence, my neighbor, a graphic designer, got his ADSL back on the same day as we did. But he, who didn’t have a good friend up in the FT hierarchy, had spent the full 3 weeks without.

Emerging Economy, Emerging Disease

Two extraordinary excerpts from the recent NY Times article on Diabetes in India.

In a changing India, it seems to go this way: make good money and get cars, get houses, get servants, get meals out, get diabetes.

and

The world has now reached the point, according to the United Nations, where more people are overweight than undernourished.

Living Long in Geographic America

The philosophy of healthcare provision in the USA traditionally relies on the anything-that-isn’t-socialism-is-worthy-of-a-look approach, and while waiting for the Big Idea that actually works, the smart approach is make lots of money, position yourself to be able to buy expensive healthcare when needed. For as the French used to say before putting together the best (socialized) healthcare system in the world, “It’s better to be rich and healthy than poor and sickly”.

A recent study, however, indicates that the smart money approach might not yield the healthiest results. Seems that those Americans living longest do not fit into the groupings you might expect, ie, well-off non-smoking Birkenstock-wearing whites living in good suburbs.

The list of the “eight Americans”, sorted by descending longevity (along with that critical average per capita income figure) are:

  • Asian-Americans, average per capita income of $21,566 (€16,964), have a life expectancy of 84.9 years.
  • Northland low-income rural whites, $17,758 (€13,968), 79 years.
  • Middle America (mostly white), $24,640 (€19,382), 77.9 years.
  • Low-income whites in Appalachia, Mississippi Valley, $16,390 (€12,892), 75 years.
  • Western American Indians, $10,029 (€7,889), 72.7 years.
  • Black Middle America, $15,412 (€12,123), 72.9 years.
  • Southern low-income rural blacks, $10,463 (€8,230), 71.2 years.
  • High-risk urban blacks, $14,800 (€11,642), 71.1 years.

American expatriates living in the SW of France were not included in the study, so I don’t know where I stand.

The Reader’s Digest version can be found in today’s IHT here.

How Many Amendments Fit on the Head of a Pin?

Translating from Le Monde this morning:

In an extraordinary plenipotentiary session of the French National Assembly devoted to drafting a law governing the privatization of Gaz de France, the various parties of the left added 137,347 amendments to the text of the original law. 43,693 of these were added by the Socialist Party, 93,654 by the Communist Party (which is still alive and well in France).

137, 347 separate, bulleted phrases. Imagine that! Have the 25% of working frenchpersonnes who are civil servants been put to the task of writing amendments?

I offer this information to those in the US who don’t read French, who wonder if anything could be worse than American politics, American politicians, and in particular, the Democrat Party’s ongoing feebleness in responding meaningfully to Great Evil perpetrated by Morons. Here we perceive the French equivalent: admittedly no bull-in-the-china-shop warmongering, no torture, no vote rigging, but pretty lame lawmaking, great cynicism, great amounts of bluster. This seems to be the way France deals with important problems of late.
Sigh…

Technorati Tags: , ,

So You Want to Be an ISP in the South of France?

Back in August, 1996, I started publishing on the web my adventures and thoughts about the the company I had created a few months earlier in Albi called I-Link, ‘Internet en Pays de Cocagne’.

I had thought, at the time, that starting a business in France, a tech business, and the very first Internet service/access provider in my part of France at that, was worth a chronicle. It was like a blog, but at the time, people wrote FAQs when they wanted to say something that hoped to be useful. So I called my articles the ISP-in-France FAQ.

I just reread it and thought, well, it had aged OK… considering that it’s ten years now and a LOT of stuff has happened in the meanwhile. And amazingly, it is so On Subject.

So for those of you who missed it the first time around, here it is, in appropriately placed installments, in Blogosphere 2006.

Part 1: Business à la Sauce Française

France is a kind, gentle country where people spend a lot of time thinking about what the right thing to do is. I know this sounds good, but it leads to at least two terrifying realities:

  • crossing the street, which most of us mastered as five-year olds, remains a perilous activity for children of all ages (thoughtful drivers dissecting thorny social-political dilemmas from behind the wheel do not “see” pedestrians).
  • if you’d rather be an entrepreneur than a municipal employee or letter carrier you are presumed guilty of the sins of usurpation, manipulation, and greed. For the good of all, you must be de-clawed.

Crossing the Street?
Easy: always cross at a marked intersection. Look both ways. When you think you can make it across, run like hell. Wear body armor.

De-clawed?
This is the complex reflection of a venerable, sophisticated culture that has witnessed its own transformation into an important modern industrial society but has never really accepted the fact.

What do you mean, a venerable, sophisticated culture?

  • In France profonde, Authenticity is an important concept. You cannot buy a McCamembert (yet). When something goes out the doors it will be “just so”, but it will be carefully wrapped (vive la France!) in multiple layers of Chaos.
  • Even when it doesn’t work, it’s lovely. No styrofoam peanuts allowed.
  • French is the language of Love, Diplomacy, and Dining.

What do you mean, an important modern industrial society?
The french economy is the world’s fourth fifth largest, behind the United States, Japan, and Germany and England; ahead of Italy, England, and Canada. Its balance of trade is consistently positive.

Violent crime is low. Literacy (and unemployment and taxes) is high. Despite the fact that frenchpersonnes smoke, drink, and eat a lot of cholesterol, they have a greater life expectancy than just about any western people. This is called the “French Paradox”.

But why don’t they accept the fact?
This is more difficult. It was explained to me thusly, one evening over a second bottle of Domaine de Mazou, 1991:

“Your american capitalism is the jungle; the denizens must become strong and sleek to stay alive, it is each man for himself. You create a class of fabulously rich and another of fabulously poor. You enshrine freedom. But not equality.

“Here it is closer to the zoo. Everybody has their box, properly laid out; the predators are separated from their prey. We do not accept that people slip through the cracks simply because they have never wanted to learn how to read a balance sheet, or are too poor to hire a lawyer. We have chosen collectively to curtail [your type of] freedom as a way of maintaining equality.”

So in the end, the entrepreneur is perceived as the creature trying to break out of the zoo in order to find his way back to the jungle. In a well-designed zoo, this can only occur by allowing rules to be broken.

Yes, like I was saying, in France, even when it doesn’t work, it’s lovely.